zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. demall+(OP)[view] [source] 2015-11-14 04:23:37
I'm not convinced that people linking immigrants and terrorism are particularly worried about the actual immigrants turning out to be terrorists in disguise. It's more a worry that they will just add to the ghettoisation of Islamic communities, which is precisely where this latest crop of French terrorists seem to have sprung from.
replies(1): >>scroll+f
2. scroll+f[view] [source] 2015-11-14 04:27:37
>>demall+(OP)
> I'm not convinced that people linking immigrants and terrorism are particularly worried about the actual immigrants turning out to be terrorists in disguise.

You'd be really surprised. Your point is a valid one, but one I seldom see brought up - most people are just worried that for every 100 immigrants there's a couple of actual terrorists in the lot... Mostly because nobody's told them how stupid that notion is.

replies(2): >>TeMPOr+w1 >>mercur+S8
◧◩
3. TeMPOr+w1[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-11-14 05:06:19
>>scroll+f
> Mostly because nobody's told them how stupid that notion is.

Oh some people try. Hell, I told that to many people myself. People don't care about things like actually being reasonable. Instead, they're afraid and are looking to rationalize it.

◧◩
4. mercur+S8[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-11-14 08:48:10
>>scroll+f
Well, it is possible that ISIS would try to infiltrate operators this way (in fact, they caught a convicted terrorist in Italy hiding as a refugee a few days ago).
replies(1): >>scroll+G9
◧◩◪
5. scroll+G9[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-11-14 09:13:08
>>mercur+S8
Possible, yes. Efficient, not really. If they don't get in this way they'll get in another way - closing down borders is about just as efficient as the ban on drugs at stoping drug cartels.
replies(1): >>mercur+ng
◧◩◪◨
6. mercur+ng[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-11-14 12:44:08
>>scroll+G9
I'm not disputing that, but I'm saying it's not an irrational concern.
[go to top]