zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. toyg+(OP)[view] [source] 2015-11-14 00:58:29
By making the secret services work for their money on real problems, instead of fretting about tapping media pirates and suchlike. By having a foreign policy that does not rely on military intervention at the drop of a hat. By not starting fires all over the place. The list is long and well-known.
replies(1): >>S4M+O1
2. S4M+O1[view] [source] 2015-11-14 01:17:18
>>toyg+(OP)
I don't think any secret service could prevent any isolated individual to make at home, say, Molotov cocktails, and throw them by car in a crowd.
replies(1): >>toyg+o3
◧◩
3. toyg+o3[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-11-14 01:38:46
>>S4M+O1
But these weren't isolated individuals. This was an organised network with grenades and assault rifles and the training to handle them.

This is not a Breivik, or a "Shoe Bomber" Reid; this is '70s-style, organised, cross-border terrorism -- the sort of which "we" were supposed to be good at handling by now.

[go to top]