zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. lmm+(OP)[view] [source] 2015-09-06 23:08:35
The ad hominem was "doesn't get HN in the first place". It's very dismissive of people who disagree with you. And it's not the first time you've responded like this.

I don't get it? No, you don't get it.

replies(1): >>dang+v1
2. dang+v1[view] [source] 2015-09-06 23:51:33
>>lmm+(OP)
Oh, I see now. Sorry about that. Normally I'd delete it, but in this case I suppose I'd better leave it in.

I still don't see any ad hominem, and as a statement of HN's very specific values it seems obvious to me, but you're right that I shouldn't have said it in a dismissive way.

[go to top]