zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. stecke+(OP)[view] [source] 2015-09-06 21:23:58
If the workarounds are so commonly accepted, can you start automagically editing the links to be the google/url redirect bypass then?
replies(1): >>TeMPOr+U
2. TeMPOr+U[view] [source] 2015-09-06 21:36:18
>>stecke+(OP)
Or add a [bypass paywall] link, like there used to be a [scribd] link? ;).
replies(1): >>dang+Z
◧◩
3. dang+Z[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-09-06 21:37:07
>>TeMPOr+U
It's tempting. But https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10179116.
replies(2): >>TeMPOr+Y1 >>stecke+a2
◧◩◪
4. TeMPOr+Y1[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-09-06 21:53:11
>>dang+Z
Yup. I thought about exactly the same reasons you described there; that's why I put a ";)".

But while we're at it, how about a [cache] link? More often than not we end up overloading the submitted site and there's always a comment with Google Cache link.

◧◩◪
5. stecke+a2[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-09-06 21:56:48
>>dang+Z
Even just a [paywall] like you do [pdf] to warn people not to bother clicking it would help greatly.
replies(1): >>dang+im
◧◩◪◨
6. dang+im[view] [source] [discussion] 2015-09-07 07:37:18
>>stecke+a2
[pdf] is added by software.
[go to top]