zlacker

[return to "SpaceX CRS-3 Mission"]
1. ColinW+U7[view] [source] 2014-04-18 17:25:22
>>ColinW+(OP)
Is this submission being flagged by users, or has it tripped some sort of scoring penalty?

http://hnrankings.info/7609667/

Dropping suddenly from 3rd to 20th on the front page suggests some sort of penalty being applied, but is it community driven, or automated? Even with the new openness about the actions of the moderators on HN I still find some things deeply confusing.

Added in edit: This does bring home just how important upvotes are. I've seen how disproportional the effect is of downvotes on an item's ranking - one downvotes out-weights many upvotes. If you like something, upvote it, or see it sink without trace.

◧◩
2. dang+Al[view] [source] 2014-04-18 20:03:21
>>ColinW+U7
I put a moderate moderator flag on it so that it would be lower, but still on the front page. My reasoning: Space X is cool and interesting, but it isn't a major story every time they do a launch.

Edit: We took the penalty off several hours ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7611240

◧◩◪
3. Brando+Au[view] [source] 2014-04-18 22:00:48
>>dang+Al
What's with all the downvotes? He simply states his reasoning, and after a mea culpa later on, makes the change people ask for (un-flag the story). Disagreeing is one thing (and isn't that what comments & conversation is for?), but voting the comment down seems petty.
◧◩◪◨
4. saraid+ix[view] [source] 2014-04-18 22:48:38
>>Brando+Au
Downvotes are considered a legitimate expression of disagreement on HN. This is pg-level policy.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. sergio+Rz[view] [source] 2014-04-18 23:38:37
>>saraid+ix
And the result is that important information is now silenced. The comment is now greyed out. Disagreement should not lead to silencing.
[go to top]