zlacker

[return to "FBI couldn't get into WaPo reporter's iPhone because Lockdown Mode enabled"]
1. nova22+qq[view] [source] 2026-02-04 16:29:22
>>robin_+(OP)
Remember...they can make you use touch id...they can't make you give them your password.

https://x.com/runasand/status/2017659019251343763?s=20

The FBI was able to access Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson's Signal messages because she used Signal on her work laptop. The laptop accepted Touch ID for authentication, meaning the agents were allowed to require her to unlock it.

◧◩
2. wackge+Pr[view] [source] 2026-02-04 16:35:44
>>nova22+qq
Link which doesn't directly support website owned by unscrupulous trillionaire: https://xcancel.com/runasand/status/2017659019251343763?s=20
◧◩◪
3. appare+6R1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 23:22:43
>>wackge+Pr
There are trillionaires?
◧◩◪◨
4. alpini+bU1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 23:42:00
>>appare+6R1
I guess technically musk rounds to a trillion. 852B acc to Forbes
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. appare+1r2[view] [source] 2026-02-05 04:14:27
>>alpini+bU1
That would be some aggressive rounding.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. alpini+wn3[view] [source] 2026-02-05 13:07:45
>>appare+1r2
Yes and no. Obviously it’s unusual rounding or I wouldn’t have said “I guess technically,” but rounding is all about domains and relevant precision. To be honest, when someone says “billionaires” I don’t assume that the number 1,000,000 is a meaningful hard cut off. I assume we’re talking about the ones who are three orders of magnitude up from “millionaire” and orders of magnitude work by rounding from .5.
[go to top]