zlacker

[return to "FBI couldn't get into WaPo reporter's iPhone because Lockdown Mode enabled"]
1. nova22+qq[view] [source] 2026-02-04 16:29:22
>>robin_+(OP)
Remember...they can make you use touch id...they can't make you give them your password.

https://x.com/runasand/status/2017659019251343763?s=20

The FBI was able to access Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson's Signal messages because she used Signal on her work laptop. The laptop accepted Touch ID for authentication, meaning the agents were allowed to require her to unlock it.

◧◩
2. patric+at[view] [source] 2026-02-04 16:41:09
>>nova22+qq
Is the knowledge of which finger to use protected as much as a passcode? Law enforcement might have the authority to physically hold the owner's finger to the device, but it seems that the owner has the right to refuse to disclose which finger is the right one. If law enforcement doesn't guess correctly in a few tries, the device could lock itself and require the passcode.

Another reason to use my dog's nose instead of a fingerprint.

◧◩◪
3. parl_m+wH[view] [source] 2026-02-04 17:44:41
>>patric+at
I really wish Apple would offer a pin option on macos. For this reason, precisely. Either that, or an option to automatically disable touchid after a short amount of time (eg an hour or if my phone doesn't connect to the laptop)
◧◩◪◨
4. redeem+4t1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 21:15:12
>>parl_m+wH
uhm, are you saying its not possible to require an actual password to unlock osx?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. parl_m+q52[view] [source] 2026-02-05 01:03:09
>>redeem+4t1
> uhm, are you saying its not possible to require an actual password to unlock osx?

uhm, are saying that i'm saying that? if so, please show me where i said that. thank you

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. redeem+ig3[view] [source] 2026-02-05 12:09:27
>>parl_m+q52
no, thats why i was asking, as i was not fully sure what you meant
[go to top]