zlacker

>>WaitWa+(OP)
Hopefully this is a wakeup call to the software engineers and other employees at those companies - it's no longer a hypothetical future where the tools you are building might be abused, it's today.

>>doctob+23
But those tools buy Teslas and $8 donuts and cardboard apartments in trendy neighborhoods for people too young to understand how money works.

>>tokyob+R3
Quite the high horse you got there

>>badbir+B4
It’s worth pointing out that a non-insignificant subset of tech workers know the impacts and still don’t give a fuck though.

>>hsbaua+P4
Is it worth pointing out? It seems counterproductive to respond to a call to action by sarcastically complaining about the people being called to action.

>>SpicyL+M9
The call is coming from inside the house.

>>tokyob+Qa
As effective calls to action often do! It's almost tautological when I say it this way, but if you want people working in ad tech to oppose ICE you have to convince them it's good for people working in ad tech to oppose ICE.

Perhaps the conflict is that you just want to make people who work in ad tech feel bad, and don't care whether or not they enable ICE? That's fine, I suppose, there's industries I feel the same way about. But then we don't have much to talk about and I'm not sure what you hope to gain from being here. To me opposing ICE is very important - I think tobacco companies are pretty bad too, but if ICE sent out a request for cartons of cigarettes I'd shovel praise on them for declining.

>>SpicyL+ed
That’s the voice part of exit, loyalty, voice is it not?