zlacker

>>fugu2+(OP)
Or they could just let people use their own harnesses again...

>>esafak+o0c
That wouldn't solve this problem.

And they do? That's what the API is.

The subscription always seemed clearly advertised for client usage, not general API usage, to me. I don't know why people are surprised after hacking the auth out of the client. (note in clients they can control prompting patterns for caching etc, it can be cheaper)

>>usef-+s1c
End users -- people who use harnesses -- have subscriptions so that makes no sense. General API usage is for production.