zlacker

[return to "Xcode 26.3 – Developers can leverage coding agents directly in Xcode"]
1. flohof+o5[view] [source] 2026-02-03 18:24:34
>>davidb+(OP)
Building castles in the sky while the foundation is rotting away :/ Xcode really needs a couple of years of pure bugfix and optimization releases instead of hype-chasing.
◧◩
2. allthe+Kf[view] [source] 2026-02-03 19:02:56
>>flohof+o5
Honest question.

I've been using XCode for 10 years. For me, it's only improved and I don't have any real pain points. They are definitely fixing bugs. I make software for iOS, macOS, car play, and apple watch.

Sure sometimes I've got to reset or clear a cache, but this has never stopped my day.

What is so horrible about XCode?

◧◩◪
3. ASalaz+3o[view] [source] 2026-02-03 19:37:56
>>allthe+Kf
> I've been using XCode for 10 years. For me, it's only improved and I don't have any real pain points.

This means you've learned to work around its shortcomings. A decade ago I used to develop in PyCharm for websites, and Visual Studio .Net for desktop apps. Then I had to learn XCode for a mobile app.

It was a surreal experience, like going back ten years in UX, while at the same time dealing with a myriad of modern but artificial limitations and breaking changes that meant the app needed frequent housekeeping even when its features remained unchanged.

For a company that gets a huge part of its revenue on its oversized App Store tax, developers, and their tooling, should be one of their highest priorities IMO. Instead, we get Kafkaesque situations like "my app doesn't compile today... oh, I need to open my Apple Developer account in the browser and accept a new little change in their kilometric EULA that I always pretend I've read carefully". Things like this could be handled better.

Edit: I also had to learn Android Studio for another app, and the experience had less friction overall, but that could mean that I've also learned to work around the shortcomings of JetBrains IDEs. Google is undeniably more developer-friendly than Apple IMO, though.

◧◩◪◨
4. marxis+kI2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 12:30:29
>>ASalaz+3o
> Google is undeniably more developer-friendly than Apple IMO, though

Yeah, I love editing XML files to build my app

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. ASalaz+084[view] [source] 2026-02-04 19:31:34
>>marxis+kI2
I meant the companies.

For example, Apple Developer costs 99 USD a year, and you are forced to develop on a physical Mac. Google Developer has a free tier, and lets you develop on Windows/Linux/MacOS/VM.

This is just one of the little ways where Google products prioritize developers, while Apple products prioritize market share and consumers. Both companies have abusive practices, can't argue that, but Apple has more needless friction for developers.

[go to top]