zlacker

[return to "New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers"]
1. robfly+dO1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 00:20:10
>>ptorro+(OP)
My main concern is, how long is it before you can't print a replacement part for something you bought because it looks too similar to an OEM part and the manufacturer doesn't think you should be able to do that so they throw a little money to the right politician.
◧◩
2. 2muchc+QL2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 08:41:48
>>robfly+dO1
Too bad everyone jumped shipped to Bambuu Labs. If only we still had open source hardware.
◧◩◪
3. 0xedd+NQ2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 09:21:36
>>2muchc+QL2
None I know did. If you do your research, all the hype around Bambu is paid. Influencers pushed it. Tech deep dives show it is sub standard. Posted on HN.

Prusa is king. High quality. Open source. EU made and engineered. Slicer is a market leader (Bambu's a fork of it).

◧◩◪◨
4. JKCalh+4q3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 13:40:12
>>0xedd+NQ2
I'm a hobbyist and price, in the end, sold me on Bambu Labs.

(And I stayed once I saw the quality. Likely Prusa can match or exceed it, but not with what I was willing to lose from my wallet.)

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. ebruch+xn4[view] [source] 2026-02-04 18:12:45
>>JKCalh+4q3
Not criticizing your decision, but I went the opposite way, deciding that I was ok spending a certain extra amount initially in order to encourage a non-Chinese manufacturer. But I understand not everyone has this luxury.

I bought the Core One kit to understand better how the machine works, which reduced the price delta somewhat.

It remains to be seen over the long term which way is actually better financially, as Prusas have historically had long lives, while there is only limited data on the Bambu Lab side yet.

So far, I am quite happy with my decision. But competition is on. I am excited about the upcoming INDX system for the Core One: if it delivers on its promise, it will be fantastic!

[go to top]