zlacker

[return to "New York’s budget bill would require “blocking technology” on all 3D printers"]
1. robfly+dO1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 00:20:10
>>ptorro+(OP)
My main concern is, how long is it before you can't print a replacement part for something you bought because it looks too similar to an OEM part and the manufacturer doesn't think you should be able to do that so they throw a little money to the right politician.
◧◩
2. PlatoI+wP1[view] [source] 2026-02-04 00:27:23
>>robfly+dO1
I remember ~10 or 15 years ago, I had concerns about drones becoming illegal due to FAA.

I was assured by the internet, I was paranoid, blah blah safety...

Then a few weeks ago something about Minnesota and ICE making drones illegal to fly or something...

The weird part is that, in that 15 years, I've become more moderate and pro-democratic rule of law... but I was right about my previous concerns. Not that I believe in the Justice behind them anymore.

◧◩◪
3. TOMDM+W52[view] [source] 2026-02-04 02:18:23
>>PlatoI+wP1
The rights abuses occurring in Minnesota and at the hands of ICE are better characterised as a degradation of democracy, not a failure of it.

EDIT: To be clear, my belief is that a plurality of the voting population voted for this, that much is obvious.

My belief is also that despite the fact that the current administration was elected, there are democratic norms and rules for what outcomes require that a bill must be passed to enact, that states can decide how they can govern themselves within well defined bounds.

All of this is being ignored despite the structures defined in the American democatric system, not because of it.

◧◩◪◨
4. sheeps+h72[view] [source] 2026-02-04 02:28:26
>>TOMDM+W52
Yep. Democracy is working according to a non-minority in the country. Agree to disagree?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. mystra+Ja2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 02:58:45
>>sheeps+h72
Sure. I'll bite.

The majority in this country is "didn't vote". Multitudes of reasons for this.

They forgot.

They dont care.

They missed the registration deadline.

They're homeless, and no address.

They can't get proper papers, even though they are US born.

They're in prison/jail.

The candidates suck, so you dont vote.

Can't afford to take time off work.

They've been gerrymandered, so their votes are significantly degraded.

To think that the minority segment that, due to election game rules and FPTP, that a minority of the minority somehow reflects a majority? I wholly reject that.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. pton_x+pb2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 03:03:53
>>mystra+Ja2
It's always been this way. According to Google 64% of the voting age population voted in 2024. In 1972 it was 56%, in 1976 it was 55%, in 1980 it was 55%, in 1984 it was 56%... you get the idea [0].

[0] https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/vitalst...

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. mystra+fe2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 03:30:49
>>pton_x+pb2
"This is how its always been" is one of the banes of my existence. It explains why we're here, but not how to do better.

There are ways to do better. A national holiday for elections has been mentioned countless times.

We could do like Australia and mandate required voting.

Prisoners should be able to vote. But this country is too hell-bent on punishment.

Registration can be made on the same day of voting, rather than some states require 30 days, and others per state.

But in reality, none of these are done. Changes are glacial, if they do happen.

But these would all increase a democratic choice. Right now, its a horrendously gamified minority of a minority who decides, based on electoral college results.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. shiroi+uj2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 04:22:53
>>mystra+fe2
>"This is how its always been" is one of the banes of my existence. It explains why we're here, but not how to do better.

This is true, but it's also very useful in assigning blame (or avoiding assigning it improperly).

So for all the people who complain about all the people who didn't vote, and try to blame them for Trump's election, we can just point to the historical record for voting in US presidential elections. The truth is: the turnout was not unusually low. In fact, it was somewhat high, historically speaking (though not as high as in 2020, which was a record; you'd have to back to the 50s or early 60s to see a higher turnout, and that was in a time when Black people weren't allowed to vote in many places).

So instead of blaming non-voters, blame can be assigned properly to those who DID vote. Because the factors that have prevented many people from voting in past elections were still a factor in the most recent election.

>We could do like Australia and mandate required voting.

Right, and how do you enforce this when people aren't allowed to take time off from work to vote? Also, looking at the state of Australian politics, I don't see mandatory voting as a worthwhile fix.

>A national holiday for elections has been mentioned countless times.

Lots of people have to work on national holidays. How do they vote? Society doesn't stop needing police, firefighters, or hospital workers on national holidays. And most stores (like grocery stores) are still open, so their workers are required to go to work too.

More importantly, why do you think the GOP would ever agree to any measures to increase voter participation?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. thayne+Ks2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 06:00:58
>>shiroi+uj2
I didn't see anyone blaming non-voters. The argument is that a majority of Americans didn't vote for this, because most Americans didn't vote at all. (Also, of those that did vote, less than 50% voted for Trump).
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦
10. reveri+2z2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 06:53:56
>>thayne+Ks2
"less than 50%" being 49.8%. Kind of winning on a technicality there.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦▧
11. crote+ss3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 13:57:15
>>reveri+2z2
A big problem of the American two-party system is that you can't distinguish a vote against one party from a vote for the other party: Did all of that 49.8% vote for Trump, or was he the "lesser of two evil" for a lot of people who genuinely hated Harris?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦▧▨
12. SoftTa+MV3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 16:15:26
>>crote+ss3
Voting is always a compromise. No candidate ever perfectly represents one's own views on every issue. So IMO reasons for voting "for" a candidate or "against" another don't really matter.
[go to top]