zlacker

[return to "xAI joins SpaceX"]
1. n_u+zs[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:40:58
>>g-mork+(OP)
A former NASA engineer with a PhD in space electronics who later worked at Google for 10 years wrote an article about why datacenters in space are very technically challenging:

https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horri...

I don't have any specialized knowledge of the physics but I saw an article suggesting the real reason for the push to build them in space is to hedge against political pushback preventing construction on Earth.

I can't find the original article but here is one about datacenter pushback:

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2025-08-20/ai-and...

But even if political pushback on Earth is the real reason, it still seems datacenters in space are extremely technically challenging/impossible to build.

◧◩
2. edhela+Mt[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:46:17
>>n_u+zs
"Technically challenging", a nice way to say "impossible"
◧◩◪
3. boxede+Yy[view] [source] 2026-02-03 00:11:43
>>edhela+Mt
Just like rockets landing themselves
◧◩◪◨
4. sollew+WB[view] [source] 2026-02-03 00:30:32
>>boxede+Yy
No, rockets landing themselves is just controlling the mechanism you use to have them take off, and builds on trust vectoring technology from 1970s jet fighters based on sound physics.

Figuring out how to radiate a lot of waste heat into a vacuum is fighting physics. Ordinarily we use a void on earth as a very effective _insulator_ to keep our hot drinks hot.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. fourse+hE[view] [source] 2026-02-03 00:46:39
>>sollew+WB
His point is that everyone said landing and reusing rockets was impossible and made fun of Elon and SpaceX for years for attempting it.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. audunw+Bp1[view] [source] 2026-02-03 07:13:10
>>fourse+hE
The difference is that it was mostly clueless people like Thunderf00t who said it was impossible, who nobody took seriously. I don’t remember that basically all relevant experts claimed it was near impossible with current technology. That’s the situation now.

There’s also fairly clear distinction with how insane Elons plan has become since the first plans he laid for Tesla and SpaceX and the plans he has now. He has clearly become a megalomaniac.

Funnily enough, some of the things people said about Tesla is coming true, because Elon simply got bored of making cars. It’s now plausible that Tesla may die as a car company which I would not have imagined a few years ago. They’re arguably not even winning the self driving and robotics race.

[go to top]