zlacker

[return to "xAI joins SpaceX"]
1. gok+h4[view] [source] 2026-02-02 22:06:22
>>g-mork+(OP)
> it is possible to put 500 to 1000 TW/year of AI satellites into deep space, meaningfully ascend the Kardashev scale and harness a non-trivial percentage of the Sun’s power

We currently make around 1 TW of photovoltaic cells per year, globally. The proposal here is to launch that much to space every 9 hours, complete with attached computers, continuously, from the moon.

edit: Also, this would capture a very trivial percentage of the Sun's power. A few trillionths per year.

◧◩
2. jupp0r+To[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:24:05
>>gok+h4
See Dyson Sphere: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere
◧◩◪
3. morale+xq[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:31:39
>>jupp0r+To
Yeah, that's the point ... it's stupid to believe humanity is capable of deploying that much infrastructure. We cannot do even 0.01% of it.
◧◩◪◨
4. tlb+fu[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:48:45
>>morale+xq
What do you think the limiting factor is? I don't see why we can't scale manufacturing of satellites up as far as we want. If we mine out a substantial fraction of the mass of the earth, we can go harvest asteroids or something.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. skywho+Iu[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:50:45
>>tlb+fu
The physical amount of material in the solar system is a pretty big limiting factor.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. willtu+ux[view] [source] 2026-02-03 00:03:51
>>skywho+Iu
Yeah, but besides not having the physical amount of material available in the solar system, or the availability of any technology to transfer power generated to a destination where it can serve a meaningful purpose in the foreseeable future, or having the political climate or capital necessary for even initiating such an effort, or not being able to do so without severely kneecapping the habitability of our planet, there are aren't really any meaningful barriers that I can see.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Shroud+vA[view] [source] 2026-02-03 00:22:08
>>willtu+ux
Are you suggesting that beggars would ride, if only wishes were horses!?
[go to top]