zlacker

>>simonw+(OP)
I wonder if the era of dynamic programming languages is over. Python/JS/Ruby/etc. were good tradeoffs when developer time mattered. But now that most code is written by LLMs, it's as "hard" for the LLM to write Python as it is to write Rust/Go (assuming enough training data on the language ofc; LLMs still can't write Gleam/Janet/CommonLisp/etc.).

Esp. with Go's quick compile time, I can see myself using it more and more even in my one-off scripts that would have used Python/Bash otherwise. Plus, I get a binary that I can port to other systems w/o problem.

Compiled is back?

>>behnam+sj
> Plus, I get a binary that I can port to other systems w/o problem.

So cross-platform vibe-coded malware is the future then?

>>rvz+gk
I hope that AVs will also evolve using the new AI tech to detect this type of malware.

>>yibers+zl
Honestly I looked at Go for malware and I mean AV detection for golang used to be ehh but recently It got strong.

Then it became a cat and mouse game with obfuscators and deobfucsators.

John Hammond has a *BRILLIANT* Video on this topic. 100% recommneded.

Honestly Speaking from John Hammond I feel like Nim as a language or V-lang is something which will probably get vibe coded malware from. Nim has been used for hacking so much that iirc windows actually blocked the nim compiler as malware itself!

Nim's biggest issue is that hackers don't know it but if LLM's fix it. Nim becomes a really lucrative language for hackers & John Hammond described that Nim's libraries for hacking are still very decent.