zlacker

[return to "Alex Honnold completes Taipei 101 skyscraper climb without ropes or safety net"]
1. squigz+04[view] [source] 2026-01-25 04:28:24
>>keepam+(OP)
Stuff like this seems a bit... selfish? to me. Why risk falling, and people having to see that/having to clean that up? For a bit of adrenaline and publicity? Meh.
◧◩
2. komali+94[view] [source] 2026-01-25 04:30:39
>>squigz+04
The Taipei tourism bureau disagrees. Many here as well. The more eyes on Taiwan, the better. I'm grateful Alex was willing to risk his life for this spectacle, now potentially millions will have at least some concept of Taipei and Taiwan in their minds.
◧◩◪
3. Secret+p5[view] [source] 2026-01-25 04:45:28
>>komali+94
Did he do this climb with no safety equipment for Taiwan or for Alex?

I'm with the OP - watching people so willfully put their lives in danger isn't my cup of tea. I'm just glad he didn't die.

◧◩◪◨
4. komali+48[view] [source] 2026-01-25 05:16:06
>>Secret+p5
You put your life in danger every time you get behind the wheel of a car. Statistically more danger than a free solo climber.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. kelnos+oa[view] [source] 2026-01-25 05:43:54
>>komali+48
False equivalence. It's by no means required to free climb a skyscraper. While you might say it's also not required to get behind the wheel of a car, the difficulty in getting places (like a job, for example) without doing so in many locations makes it more or less required.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. andrew+ig[view] [source] 2026-01-25 06:55:58
>>kelnos+oa
Except, using your malleable logic the response is easy, this is Honnold's job.
[go to top]