zlacker

>>clowes+(OP)
> If you're a man, one of your hardest battle may be not giving in to sexual urges that cause harm to others. History is littered with otherwise entirely brilliant men who succeeded at everything but this. You must succeed.

I'm not sure I like the framing of this

>>thebla+Z5
Uh, yeah. I've been a man my entire life and I've never ever had a problem with wanting to let my sexual urges cause harm to others. I have a very high libido even. Not once has this been a problem.

The fuck is this about?

>>Loughl+b8
Same.

Leaving aside the "If you're a man ..." condescending crap, that "cause harm to others" bit reveals a lot about the author.

Sorry pal, you're alone on that hill.

>>aipats+hd
This bullshit is why #NotAllMen is a farcical trope among feminists.

Can ya'll please grow slightly thicker skin?

It doesn't take much effort to give the author benefit of doubt, especially when he already qualified his claim with "If you're a man, one of your hardest battles may be..."

To those who are unaware, "may be" signals uncertainty. It signals #NotAllMen.

Stop whining.