zlacker

[return to ""]
1. mrweas+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-13 16:50:11
I loved Dilbert, having worked for more than one Dilbert-like company the humor frequently resonated with me.

How or why Scott Adams went completely of the rails is perhaps something we'll sadly never understand. Was this opinions he'd always had, but suppressed, did he somehow become radicalized or was it perhaps medically induced, e.g. a stroke or something. It was incredibly sad to see him throw away his life's work and go down a path most of us at least hadn't foreseen and die having alienated his fans.

2. dragon+03[view] [source] 2026-01-13 16:59:44
>>mrweas+(OP)
> How or why Scott Adams went completely of the rails is perhaps something we'll sadly never understand. Was this opinions he'd always had, but suppressed,

They weren't surpressed; he was very open about them from very early on in his career as a comic artist; they were central to his “origin story” and were woven directly into the comics. Its just, for a while, other aspects of his still-recent experience in corporate America gave him other relatable things to say that were mixed in with them, which made it easier to overlook them.

◧◩
3. the_af+N5[view] [source] 2026-01-13 17:07:24
>>dragon+03
Were there early signs? I don't know of them, but to be honest, I mostly "knew" him through Dilbert. When he turned out to be a bigot it was a disappointing surprise to me.
◧◩◪
4. LgWood+on[view] [source] 2026-01-13 18:05:48
>>the_af+N5
The misogyny has always been there.

The 6/11/1994 comic about sensitivity training comes to mind. "I can't find my keys" and "my blouse falls to the floor."

◧◩◪◨
5. cloudf+PY1[view] [source] 2026-01-14 01:33:43
>>LgWood+on
The joke is that the guys are idiots about women. This isn't misogyny.
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. profsu+wQ2[view] [source] 2026-01-14 10:51:42
>>cloudf+PY1
The "people acknowledge my existence, people hold the door for me" is not about them being idiots. It's Scott arguing that women have it easy compared to men (which may or may not be true, feminists will disagree).
[go to top]