zlacker

[return to "Eat Real Food"]
1. schmuc+54[view] [source] 2026-01-07 17:37:52
>>atestu+(OP)
Speaking from personal experience, this is consistent with multiple doctors over the years recommending high-protein, low carb diets. (Clarification: low does not mean no carb.)

I don't understand people freaking out over this - outside of a purely political reflex - hell hath no fury like taking away nerds' Mountain Dew and Flamin' Hot Cheetos.

Nor do I understand the negative reactions to new restrictions on SNAP - candy and sugary drinks are no longer eligible.

◧◩
2. epolan+zL1[view] [source] 2026-01-08 01:44:47
>>schmuc+54
> I don't understand people freaking out over this

Personally I'm not a fan of any diet that recommends high meat consumption and I say that as someone who eats everything.

Cattle outweighs the total livestock on this planet by a 10 to 1 factor.

While governments pretend to do stuff for the environment, they seem to always ignore the extreme cost on the environment and pollution caused by cattle. Even focusing on CO2 emissions by industry avoids the elephant of the room of the insane levels of methane produced by cows, a gas that's 200 times more harmful.

There is little evidence that a meat heavy diet is good for people, but there's plenty of evidence of the contrary.

So, to be honest, while I don't freak out and I'm all for freedom, there has to be also some kind of consciousness into how do we use the resources on this planet, and diet is by far more impactful than the transport of choice.

◧◩◪
3. Playbo+k52[view] [source] 2026-01-08 04:40:01
>>epolan+zL1
Very reasonable but it could not be more unpopular right now to tell people to stop eating meat
◧◩◪◨
4. ruszki+cp2[view] [source] 2026-01-08 07:56:58
>>Playbo+k52
It’s maybe unpopular, but people should feel bad about it, especially they should feel shame. I don’t feel it either, who knows this for decades, and even tried a few times. But I should. There is exactly zero pressure regarding this.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. epolan+3U2[view] [source] 2026-01-08 12:45:20
>>ruszki+cp2
I don't think people should feel bad about it, but at least informed.

A better thing would he to have a carbon tax, so you have higher vat on beef than poultry and higher for poultry than eggs.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Dangit+wb3[view] [source] 2026-01-08 14:36:52
>>epolan+3U2
Why don't you think people should feel bad about it? My moral system generally dictates that I don't economically support immoral behavior, or at least seek alternatives where practical.

Don't expect a carbon tax to save us, a carbon tax is not coming.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. jamilt+RN3[view] [source] 2026-01-08 17:34:41
>>Dangit+wb3
Because people would just feel bad about it and keep doing it. I don't care about people feeling bad about immoral behavior, I care about them not doing it in the first place.
[go to top]