zlacker

[return to "Inside CECOT – 60 Minutes [video]"]
1. slg+C3[view] [source] 2025-12-23 01:06:14
>>lawles+(OP)
I'm reminded of the Letter on Justice and Open Debate[1] that Bari Weiss signed only a few years ago, now she's spiking stories like this one on CECOT for showing the current administration in a negative light.

I also wonder if this story will get the type of leeway to stay on HN to collect the 200+ upvotes and 300+ comments of that previous example or if it will be flagged off the front page within minutes like so many other similar stories.

EDIT: No idea how long this post actually lasted, but checking in an hour later to see this has been flagged completely off the first 10 pages of HN despite getting close to that 200 point total.

[1] - >>23759283

◧◩
2. cdrnsf+M3[view] [source] 2025-12-23 01:08:20
>>slg+C3
She was hired following the acquisition of Paramount to do things exactly like this. She's not a journalist.
◧◩◪
3. dralle+ho[view] [source] 2025-12-23 04:54:30
>>cdrnsf+M3
Literally not a journalist. She went from the opinion pages to writing opinion on substack. And for "some reason" was put in charge of a news organization.
◧◩◪◨
4. derekt+cq[view] [source] 2025-12-23 05:16:18
>>dralle+ho
She has worked as a staff editor in newsrooms, most notably at Tablet. It’s not accurate to say her career has solely been in the opinion section.

Also, it’s not unheard of for people working on the op-ed side of the house to become editors in chief. Most notable example I can think of would be Katharine Viner at the Guardian. And in the reverse, James Bennet went from being editor in chief at the Atlantic to running the op-ed page at the NYT.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. skywho+731[view] [source] 2025-12-23 13:11:38
>>derekt+cq
Are you actually arguing that she was a qualified choice for this role at CBS?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. cridde+G71[view] [source] 2025-12-23 13:56:46
>>skywho+731
You’d have to know the qualifying criteria to know for sure.

I suspect she was hired at least in part because she would be willing to take the heat for stuff like this,

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Smirki+7a1[view] [source] 2025-12-23 14:19:02
>>cridde+G71
Her upward trajectory has been facilitated mainly through pleasing select silicon valley billionaires by echoing their views back to them in her ironically named The Free Press outlet, which they also helped found.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. UncleM+Sw1[view] [source] 2025-12-23 16:58:53
>>Smirki+7a1
This really is the future of journalism. Just make content that a few deranged billionaires like and rise up and up and up and up. CBS doesn't have to care whether ordinary people like it. What matters is the asshole with billions of dollars.
[go to top]