zlacker

[return to "You can't refuse to be scanned by ICE's facial recognition app, DHS document say"]
1. hexbin+uk[view] [source] 2025-11-01 13:30:10
>>nh4321+(OP)
> “ICE officials have told us that an apparent biometric match by Mobile Fortify is a ‘definitive’ determination of a person’s status and that an ICE officer may ignore evidence of American citizenship—including a birth certificate—if the app says the person is an alien,”

This is "computer says no (not a citizen)". Which is horrifying

They've just created an app to justify what they were already doing right? And the argument will be "well it's a super complex app run by a very clever company so it can't be wrong"?

◧◩
2. rgsahT+8n[view] [source] 2025-11-01 13:53:12
>>hexbin+uk
> They've just created an app to justify what they were already doing right?

This was also one of the more advanced theories about the people selection and targeting AI apps used in Gaza. I've only heard one journalist spell it out, because many journalists believe that AI works.

But the dissenter said that they know it does not work and just use it to blame the AI for mistakes.

◧◩◪
3. bko+KG[view] [source] 2025-11-01 16:18:07
>>rgsahT+8n
It's better that the alternative which is humans. Unless you think enforcing laws or ever having the need to establish identity should never take place
◧◩◪◨
4. 01HNNW+eL[view] [source] 2025-11-01 16:48:57
>>bko+KG
The real alternative would be the inalienable human rights we were promised
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. pfannk+LN[view] [source] 2025-11-01 17:06:03
>>01HNNW+eL
This sort of thinking is kind of a retcon, no? The people who wrote the line you’re referencing also decided that none of the people ICE is involved with were even eligible for citizenship. If their rules held out, this wouldn’t even be a thing. I’m not arguing that their rules were correct, just that picking and choosing things they said feels intellectually dishonest.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Univer+xa1[view] [source] 2025-11-01 19:49:46
>>pfannk+LN
It’s more complex than that- initial drafts of the declaration of independence were more explicit about literally covering all people, and even had a rant about how slavery was unethical, and they compromised by cutting these in order to get enough consensus to make it happen at all. Thomas Jefferson himself was a hypocrite- he wrote a lot about how slavery was wrong and should be ended, all the while owning slaves himself.

Anyways, I think it’s perfectly reasonable to nowadays take that philosophy and apply it universally. Just because it was done unfairly and hypocritically in the past is no excuse for us to also be hypocrites nowadays.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. pfannk+wZ1[view] [source] 2025-11-02 04:43:29
>>Univer+xa1
Sorry is ICE going around enslaving Africans? I thought the topic was people being targeted for removal based on looking like a Native American. What does Jefferson’s view on slavery have to do with anything?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. Univer+4U2[view] [source] 2025-11-02 16:21:02
>>pfannk+wZ1
The context is the question of if human rights are universal or only for certain privileged groups
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. pfannk+DH3[view] [source] 2025-11-02 23:50:06
>>Univer+4U2
Those are your personal abstraction boundaries. It is a perfectly coherent set of positions to oppose enslaving humans while at the same time being selective about which humans you allow into your nation. The “founding fathers” factually prohibited non-whites from being citizens of America. So what if they were opposed to slavery or not? Those are entirely different matters, and a position on slavery does not imply anything about a position on “any person on earth can be an American”.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦
10. TheCoe+UB4[view] [source] 2025-11-03 11:25:23
>>pfannk+DH3
This is not an issue of who is allowed into the country. It is an issue of who has the right to due process to determine whether they are allowed in the country or not.

The first point should not apply to everyone, but the second absolutely must. Trusting an un-auditable black box over all other evidence to determine who is allowed in the country is a violation of everyone's human rights.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦▧
11. pfannk+B85[view] [source] 2025-11-03 15:18:06
>>TheCoe+UB4
What due process is being skipped? People are arrested all the time when they are innocent, and that is not widely considered to be skipping due process. If they are jailed for a crime without appearing before a judge for example then due process has been skipped, but whether someone has committed a crime requires a judge to check, whereas I imagine whether someone is in the country legally just requires checking some databases. Have citizens been deported by accident? I haven’t seen any reports of that.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦▧▨
12. Univer+FR5[view] [source] 2025-11-03 18:52:12
>>pfannk+B85
You seem to be unaware of what is happening right now on the streets- there are thousands of videos all over social media you should spend a few hours watching. Peaceful citizens minding their own business are being terrorized and beaten by unprofessional and violent masked goons at a massive scale. The perpetrators are hiding their identities and often refusing to even look at documents proving someone is a citizen. In the detention centers people are being brutalized- left to sit for days in human shit, diabetics denied insulin, bright lights on 24/7, and food and water provided only as rewards for desires behaviors. Congress is denied their legal right and responsibility to tour the facilities, allowing them to hide human rights abuses. The cruelty and sadism of the tactics used is ratcheting up every week, and any agents that try to act lawfully are purged. Victims have no recourse- the DOJ and legal system are blocking victims from being able to even press charges, allowing these abuses to continue with no recourse.

I'm not sure about citizens being deported other than children of non-citizens together with their parents, but they are deporting huge numbers of people here legally on visas, green cards, and valid asylum claims. They revoked visas of some 6,000 college students - mostly for political "wrongthink" and then sent ICE agents after them, when it's actually legal in the USA for them to remain with a revoked student visa as long as they arrived legally, and illegal to detain or deport. They've also arrested and detained hundreds of citizens, that they absolutely knew were citizens, for peaceful protesting and video taping their illegal activities.

[go to top]