zlacker

>>sschue+(OP)
This is a great example of how this whole requirement hasn't been properly thought out.

> Desktop support is not currently within the project's scope.

What I would like to take from this is that, by their own definition, desktop apps are out of scope for Age Verification. So does that mean we will see a return of the 'desktop applications' instead of everything being a web service ?

One can dream perhaps. Until then adults who are willing to 'do what they're told' will be the ones who are inconvenienced by this constantly.

Edit: Also this will completely disable any new phone OS' being developed. Why would anyone bother when you can't verify your wallet to do anything online.

>>bileka+vb
> oes that mean we will see a return of the 'desktop applications'...?

No. It's still required by law, which means that your desktop application will require some interaction with your smartphone.

>>Luker8+xc
The wallet app can be started using a QR code. You can then finish the verification on your phone and continue on the desktop website/app/whatever.

>>Aaargh+Pd
What if you don't have a phone? Or what if your phone runs a custom rom and can't pass google's attlestation?

>>helloj+hl
"Google, google everywhere. It's attestation is gonna be a nightmare."

Idk I created this just right now lol.

But on a serious note, Maybe check out my comment on something known as the android_translation_layer with flatpak to see if that might help to run that app atleast in linux.

Linking it here : >>45361397