zlacker

[return to "Shopify, pulling strings at Ruby Central, forces Bundler and RubyGems takeover"]
1. _fat_s+le[view] [source] 2025-09-23 16:29:02
>>bradge+(OP)
> Sidekiq withdrew its $250,000/year sponsorship for Ruby Central because they platformed DHH at RailsConf 2025.

Honest question: What's the issue with DHH here? What did he do that caused them to pull support because he was platformed at RailsConf?

◧◩
2. dismal+Af[view] [source] 2025-09-23 16:33:07
>>_fat_s+le
Probably the fact that DHH introduced Solid Queue to Rails which can replace Sidekiq. Of course they're not going to say that, it'll be some excuse about his lukewarm European politics...
◧◩◪
3. danude+6t[view] [source] 2025-09-23 17:26:46
>>dismal+Af
Also the fact that DHH complained about not wanting to live in London because of how many non-whites there are, praising violent far-right agitators, and repeating debunked racist claims.
◧◩◪◨
4. christ+cM1[view] [source] 2025-09-24 01:37:56
>>danude+6t
Source? That’s hard for me to believe.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. aslatt+4U1[view] [source] 2025-09-24 02:44:52
>>christ+cM1
"As I remember London": https://world.hey.com/dhh/as-i-remember-london-e7d38e64
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. christ+cQ2[view] [source] 2025-09-24 12:24:23
>>aslatt+4U1
I can see how you'd read it that way, but I read it like this, "I went to Lisbon and it was basically a bunch of California programmer bros. The culture there has been lost, and that loss is regrettable."

In other words, it can be read more charitably as a lamentation about the loss / changing of a culture.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. yawara+Ni3[view] [source] 2025-09-24 14:39:03
>>christ+cQ2
Nah, it's pretty clearly dog-whistling for racists. Talking about 'native Brits' vs 'mass immigration' changing the 'culture and makeup'? People don't say 'makeup' to refer to California programmer bro culture, they are talking about racial makeup.

Then he goes on about 'Pakistani rape gangs' and 'abuse of British girls'–oh look, the classic trope of the nasty browns and blacks preying on our precious white children.

Then take this: 'There's absolutely nothing racist or xenophobic in saying that Denmark is primarily a country for the Danes, Britain primarily a united kingdom for the Brits, and Japan primarily a set of islands for the Japanese.'

These words would not be out of place in 1066 Britain ie 'this is a country of the Saxons, not the Normans'. Britain has seen this exact brand of xenophobia for millennia, in fact they even had periods of bigotry against Danes! If dhh had gone to London at the wrong point in history, he might have experienced racial prejudice.

Interesting, right?

[go to top]