zlacker

[return to "Charlie Kirk killed at event in Utah"]
1. Molito+xx[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:42:17
>>david9+(OP)
This is nuts. I am deeply worried we are headed towards open armed conflict. The violence against political opponents must stop, no matter who it is.
◧◩
2. tootie+ST[view] [source] 2025-09-10 23:36:46
>>Molito+xx
It may make no difference but as of now we have no idea who did this or why. We still have no idea what was the motive of the man who shot Trump's ear.
◧◩◪
3. potato+x61[view] [source] 2025-09-11 01:10:18
>>tootie+ST
We don't have "no idea". We have god knows how many hours of the dead guy spewing his opinions in 1080p and 4k. And for all of those variety opinions we know who gets pissed off by them.

I mean, sure, it could've been a crazy ex or a former business partner or whatever. But how many crazy ex's can one guy have? And he's pissed off god knows how many people by saying things? Strictly by the numbers this was almost certainly someone who hated him for what he said.

Statistically most people don't go out like Ozzy (i.e. spend a good chunk of your life doing something likely to be the death of you only to get dead by something completely unrelated)

◧◩◪◨
4. tootie+E81[view] [source] 2025-09-11 01:28:58
>>potato+x61
If we're placing bets, you'd bet on political motive but we're not placing bets. I'll throw out one option that's been very popular on the right wing conspiracy circuit and maybe it was a false flag to set the stage for Martial Law. I have no proof it's true and no proof it isn't.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. crypto+mu1[view] [source] 2025-09-11 04:54:54
>>tootie+E81
Martial law has never been applied nation-wide, and it would likely not work at all but rather it would set the stage for some states to refuse federal authority, possibly leading to civil war. I know many fantasize that Trump wants all of that, but any sober observer realizes those are just that: fantasies.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. anigbr+om3[view] [source] 2025-09-11 19:15:39
>>crypto+mu1
Ironically enough Kirk was advocating for it just weeks ago: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/charlie-kirk-calls-full-...

I think it's unwise to be reflexively dismissive when norms that were previously taken for granted turn out to be ephemeral. I find a useful heuristic/gut check is to imagine explaining news from the previous week/month/year to someone who had just woken up from an extended coma.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. crypto+vw3[view] [source] 2025-09-11 20:23:21
>>anigbr+om3
Hyperbole. That's not advocating for violence.
[go to top]