zlacker

[return to "Charlie Kirk killed at event in Utah"]
1. afavou+Fd[view] [source] 2025-09-10 20:19:53
>>david9+(OP)
Don't want to talk in bad taste by going to this so early, but... this extremely unfortunate event is going to be a very telling test for the media and society at large.

A Democratic state representative in Minnesota was brutally murdered and another attacked by the same man only a couple of months ago, back in June. How many can name them? How long did their deaths stay in the headlines? How much coverage were they given, and how much coverage will Kirk be given?

My cynical side suspects we are about to hear a lot about "violence from the left" in a way we did not about the right back in June.

◧◩
2. rdtsc+Cj[view] [source] 2025-09-10 20:45:52
>>afavou+Fd
> How many can name them? How long did their deaths stay in the headlines? How much coverage were they given, and how much coverage will Kirk be given?

I couldn't have named Kirk if I saw him or heard about him before he shot and it entered the news. Not sure what that tells us -- we should know more who our representatives are, or know about various "influencers" in politics and such?

EDIT: I saw you initially mentioned two representatives who were murdered but now it looks like there is only one. So even though you criticize others for not knowing who these murdered representatives were, it seems you don't even know who they were or if they were even murdered.

> Don't want to talk in bad taste by going to this so early, but...

Well this is how usually talking in bad taste early starts ;-). It's kind of like saying "No offense, but ... $insert_offense_here".

◧◩◪
3. PaulDa+el[view] [source] 2025-09-10 20:53:09
>>rdtsc+Cj
One key difference here is that the MN Democrats killed and injured were relatively niche/local participants in the Democratic party in MN (none of that that makes their death or injury any more acceptable or less appalling). Kirk is a highly significant figure in the right wing media world.
◧◩◪◨
4. bdangu+gy[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:44:55
>>PaulDa+el
MN Democrats were not random “niche” “Democrats” but US CONGRESSMEN
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. asgees+2g1[view] [source] 2025-09-11 02:30:40
>>bdangu+gy
No, they weren't US congressmen. Funny you just like that other whining guy don't even know anything about the subject. "They" (actually only one) was a MINNESOTA CONGRESSMAN, not a US CONGRESSMEN. You probably aren't even aware there is a Minnesota congress.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. bdangu+qg1[view] [source] 2025-09-11 02:35:03
>>asgees+2g1
Minnesota is part of Canada now? Must have missed that… :)
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. rdtsc+Ni1[view] [source] 2025-09-11 02:58:55
>>bdangu+qg1
> MN Democrats were not random “niche” “Democrats” but US CONGRESSMEN reply

> Minnesota is part of Canada now? Must have missed that… :)

When you've dug yourself into a hole it's good idea to stop digging and get out instead of keep digging. As the GP pointed out, a US member of Congress refers to representative in the US Congress (that one from Washington, DC).

In addition to the US Congress, states have their legislative bodies. Melissa Hortman was a member of such a state legislative body -- the Minnesota House of Representatives.

So on one hand you sound like you know a lot about her and want her to be more well known, on the other hand you don't even know what legislative body she was a representative in. So that's pretty confusing.

[go to top]