zlacker

[return to "Delayed Security Patches for AOSP (Android Open Source Project)"]
1. OutOfH+km[view] [source] 2025-09-07 16:58:24
>>transp+(OP)
I hope that this action, along with Google's refusal to correctly safeguard and segregate apps, costs Google all of Android in the long term. Neither deserves to exist.

Any thoughts on Linux phones?

◧◩
2. add-su+An[view] [source] 2025-09-07 17:06:58
>>OutOfH+km
Unchecked Apple without real competition would be worse than the status quo.
◧◩◪
3. OutOfH+ho[view] [source] 2025-09-07 17:10:26
>>add-su+An
That is a misrepresentation because Samsung, Huawei, and various Linux vendors each will have their own answer, their own alterative. In no universe will Apple be without competition. Apple is not even a consideration since it doesn't allow unapproved app installation anyway.
◧◩◪◨
4. odo124+Ep[view] [source] 2025-09-07 17:17:49
>>OutOfH+ho
Android only ever had a chance because it is one ecosystem. Developers aren't going to develop for five slightly-different ecosystems in a trench coat.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. OutOfH+Qp[view] [source] 2025-09-07 17:18:37
>>odo124+Ep
> Developers aren't going to develop for five slightly-different ecosystems

The point, perhaps, is for one to emerge as the prominent choice, the correct one. Diversity however has its own value.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. palata+5r[view] [source] 2025-09-07 17:24:33
>>OutOfH+Qp
I wish Android manufacturers contributed to AOSP, so that it would still be one ecosystem, but with shared ownership. But I guess it's more profitable for all of them to let Google do it on their own. And it sucks for the user, because we have to live with Google's decisions.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. OutOfH+t51[view] [source] 2025-09-07 22:20:17
>>palata+5r
But does Google accept third-party contributions for AOSP?
[go to top]