zlacker

[return to "UK government states that 'safety' act is about influence over public discourse"]
1. khalic+j2[view] [source] 2025-08-15 09:36:18
>>JoshTr+(OP)
What’s with england and its complete lack of response to this kind of power grabs?
◧◩
2. yungpo+q4[view] [source] 2025-08-15 09:58:31
>>khalic+j2
there's really nothing anybody can do. protests dont work, riots dont work, petitions dont work, and theres nobody else to vote for who isn't also a cunt.
◧◩◪
3. extrai+v6[view] [source] 2025-08-15 10:19:32
>>yungpo+q4
Voting for the alternatives won't make any difference either.

The power structure is designed in such a way that it is difficult for the Government itself to do change anything.

◧◩◪◨
4. khalic+E6[view] [source] 2025-08-15 10:20:56
>>extrai+v6
Then create a new party, give talks about this, mobilize your friends, family, make them understand that civil liberty is literally worth dying for
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. esskay+r9[view] [source] 2025-08-15 10:46:09
>>khalic+E6
For a new political party to succeed in the uk you need millions in funding, and nobodys going to fund something that potentially affects their vast sums of money.

"Just start a new party and tell people about it" is perhaps the most misleading and flawed idea you could present unfortunately. There have been new parties, there are new parties at every general election, you never hear about them for good reason.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. khalic+0b[view] [source] 2025-08-15 11:03:13
>>esskay+r9
Ok I don’t know enough about this political system to contribute on that, there are some political systems built like that, like the US.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. desas+Yg[view] [source] 2025-08-15 11:51:12
>>khalic+0b
The same thing applies in the US doesn't it? There has essentially only been two political parties (three if you squint hard enough) for nearly the entire existence of the country?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. khalic+hq[view] [source] 2025-08-15 12:54:07
>>desas+Yg
Yeah that’s why I was making the parallel
[go to top]