zlacker

[return to "Fight Chat Control"]
1. Centig+jh[view] [source] 2025-08-10 19:17:53
>>tokai+(OP)
In the US, we have government programs like PRISM and unchecked oligopolies that surveil us and use that information to identify dissent, sell us ads, and alter our behavior. In the EU, there are these initiatives to surveil us in the name of safety.

Is there any regime out there who's not trying to mass-surveil their citizens for one reason or another?

◧◩
2. isaacr+vv[view] [source] 2025-08-10 21:18:13
>>Centig+jh
> Is there any regime out there who's not trying to mass-surveil their citizens for one reason or another?

Covid authoritarian policies were hugely successful and supported by mainstream people by and large. Not enough protests. Not enough dissent.

Now politicians know they can turn the power knob as high as they want and nothing will happen. Less and less dissent will be allowed, just like during covid.

If you fail to learn that and denounce those and reclaim the freedoms for all, you're going to just whine into a smaller and smaller room.

◧◩◪
3. Krssst+511[view] [source] 2025-08-11 02:40:50
>>isaacr+vv
> Covid authoritarian policies were hugely successful and supported by mainstream people by and large.

They were temporary and saved lives. Keyword here is temporary.

Of course COVID denialists are angry at it but they won in the USA now so we'll be happy getting more deaths and disabilities now that they are removing our ability to vaccinate ourselves.

◧◩◪◨
4. fc417f+ua1[view] [source] 2025-08-11 05:16:51
>>Krssst+511
Being temporary and being authoritarian are entirely orthogonal. In general I would imagine that cultures willing to accept temporary authoritarianism for the "right reasons" are more prone to falling to dictators.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Krssst+wc1[view] [source] 2025-08-11 05:43:19
>>fc417f+ua1
Most democraties have provisions for times of exceptional needs and counterpowers against that. Of course that's a weakness but a weakness that's judged better than mass deaths or complete fall of the country.

Those have to be limited in time and regularly subjected to control by democratically-elected institutions (actually vote to see if extended or not).

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. fc417f+cu1[view] [source] 2025-08-11 09:03:11
>>Krssst+wc1
I completely agree of course. My reply was simply because I think it's important not to inadvertently conflate things, particularly when the issue is contentious. In this case the concepts of authoritarian and permanency, as well as the concepts of people who deny COVID, people who distrust vaccines, and people who were dissatisfied with the various government mandates.

Granted there is quite a bit of overlap among the latter trio.

[go to top]