zlacker

>>tokai+(OP)
God fucking damn it not again

This is, what, the fifth time in ten years they try to pass shit like this?

>>isopro+ke
They only need to succeed one time. People are generally preoccupied with a lot of other things right now, so maybe this is their lucky shot…

>>9dev+Je
It's a shitty system, if one side just needs to succeed one time while the other side needs to succeed over and over again.

What really should be done is to disallow proposals, which are kinda the same. Once a mass surveillance proposal like this is defeated, it shouldn't be allowed to be constantly rebranded and reintroduced. We need a firewall in our legislative process that automatically rejects any future attempts at scanning private communications.