zlacker

>>segfau+(OP)
Am i the only one that finds

    System Information: Hardware specs, OS details, architecture
    Usage Patterns: Active time, session duration, feature usage
    Performance Metrics: Response times, resource consumption
    Unique Identifiers: Machine ID, user ID, device fingerprints
    Workspace Details: Project information, file paths (obfuscated)

Not to really bad that obtrusive? Like i don't really see anything there that i'd be offended in them taking?

>>cchanc+LB
I don't want any program on my computer including the OS to make any network calls whatsoever unless they're directly associated with executing GUI/CLI interactions I have currently undertaken as the user. Any exception should be opt-in. IMHO the entire Overton window of these remote communications is in the wrong place.

>>user39+JF
Yeah but this is industry standard

not saying this is good but everyone do this

>>tonyha+xZ
It's industry standard for porn stars to get fucked on camera. But I'm not a porn star, and I don't want to be fucked on camera.

Handwaving away this abuse of privacy by saying "everyone does it because it makes money" is a gross justification.

>>shit_g+Y01
same reason you apply at porn stars analogy

no one force you to use these tools, you can use another tools that suit your needs

if you read terms of service and privacy policy then you agree to it because you use it then company have right too