zlacker

[return to "Dilbert creator Scott Adams says he will die soon from same cancer as Joe Biden"]
1. ravens+A8[view] [source] 2025-05-19 17:38:30
>>dale_h+(OP)
That would explain his rather obvious lack of energy these days.

Adams has become a controversial figure in recent years. Regardless of what you think of him, as someone who has worked in Corporate America for over a decade, there really isn't anything quite like Dilbert to describe the sort of white collar insanity I've had to learn to take in stride. My first workplace as a junior developer was straight out of Dilbert and Office Space. I have a gigantic collection of digitized Dilbert strips that best describe office situations I've run into in real life – many of them including the pointy haired boss.

He's expressed a lot of what I would consider... stupid opinions these days, but I would be sad to learn he's no longer with us.

◧◩
2. ActorN+ri[view] [source] 2025-05-19 18:26:51
>>ravens+A8
>Adams has become a controversial figure in recent years.

He has had some questionable views all throughout his life. In his book "The Dilbert Future", which was from 1997, the last 2 chapters are some wacky stuff about manifesting - i.e if you write something down 100 times a day every day it will come true and other stuff like that.

And while that may seem a far cry from the alt-right stuff he eschews, its really not - inability to process information clearly and think in reality in lieu of ideology is the cornerstone of conservative thinking.

◧◩◪
3. orions+Do[view] [source] 2025-05-19 18:57:14
>>ActorN+ri
Manifesting is not that wacky.

Of course, you are not going to write down that you will win the lottery and then win.

But most people are their own worst enemy and self limiting to some extent. Focusing on what you want in life, and affirming it to yourself over and over, is effectively a way to brain wash yourself to change your own self limiting behavior and it’s not surprising that this is often successful.

◧◩◪◨
4. ActorN+pv[view] [source] 2025-05-19 19:32:27
>>orions+Do
Figuring on what you actually want in life and working towards that is productive, yes.

But that's mild compared to what he says. He basically says he can influence the stock market with affirmations.

You should read the chapters. https://www.scribd.com/doc/156175634/the-dilbert-future-pdf. Starts on 218.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. teddyh+xA[view] [source] 2025-05-19 20:02:47
>>ActorN+pv
> He basically says he can influence the stock market with affirmations.

He does not say that.

> Starts on 218.

Actually it’s page 246.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. ActorN+HG[view] [source] 2025-05-19 20:37:41
>>teddyh+xA
He does. He basically argues that our thoughts can influence reality - the idea is that if we perceive something happening as truth, it will become truth (along with all the bullshit pseudo science to support it)
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. teddyh+zH[view] [source] 2025-05-19 20:41:58
>>ActorN+HG
> He does.

He does not. I can’t prove a negative, but you, being the one making an assertion, could provide a quote (with context) which shows your assertion correct. Please do so.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. myname+tY[view] [source] 2025-05-19 22:32:28
>>teddyh+zH
Here is what he puts forth:

> If it's possible to control your environment through your thoughts or steer your perceptions (or soul if you prefer) through other universes, I'll bet the secret to doing that is a process called "affirmations."

> I first heard of this technique from a friend who had read a book on the topic. I don't recall the name of the book, so I apologize to the author for not mentioning it. My information came to me secondhand. I only mention it here because it formed my personal experience.

> The process as it was described to me involved visualizing what you want and writing it down fifteen times in a row, once a day, until you obtain the thing you visualized.

> The suggested form would be something like this:

> "I, Scott Adams, will win a Pulitzer Prize."

> The thing that caught my attention is that the process doesn't require any faith or positive thinking to work. Even more interesting was the suggestion that this technique would influence your environment directly and not just make you more focused on your goal. It was alleged that you would experience what seemed to be amazing coincidences when using the technique. These coincidences would be things seemingly beyond your control and totally independent of your efforts (at least from a visual view of reality).

He then goes on to discuss stock, him taking the GMAT, etc. He later continues:

> I used the affirmations again many times, each time with unlikely success. So much so that by 1988, when I decided I wanted to become a famous syndicated cartoonist, it actually felt like a modest goal.

Then he talks about syndicating Dilbert.

He doesn't say, "I can influence the stock market with affirmations," but if you read what he wrote, he is very clearly arguing that you can change reality with your thoughts.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. tome+4A3[view] [source] 2025-05-20 20:40:13
>>myname+tY
> He doesn't say, "I can influence the stock market with affirmations," but if you read what he wrote, he is very clearly arguing that you can change reality with your thoughts.

Earlier today I was reading your comment on mobile and thinking about the reply I would make. Now I am on a desktop making that reply. I'm pretty sure, therefore, that I can change reality with my thoughts, at least to some degree.

[go to top]