zlacker

>>joseph+(OP)
>This does not mean that Google is making Android a closed-source platform, but rather that the open-source aspect will only be released when a new branch is released to AOSP with those changes, including when new full versions or maintenance releases are finished.

I'll believe it when I see it. These days, words are basically meaningless from these large tech companies. Actions are what matter.

at the very least, I'm not convinced this internal branch and AOSP will be close to feature parity if they do throw some stuff out.

>>johnny+N8
The good thing is that at least the kernel and the VM/runtime need to be open source

>>merb+Fe
the VM/runtime need to be open source

Isn't ART Apache 2-licensed? They don't have to provide the source. I don't see why they would completely close it though. It would lead to forks, plus they have a lot of control through Google Play Services etc. already.

>>microt+Hm
Parts are GPLv2 with Classpath exception:

https://cs.android.com/android/platform/superproject/main/+/...

>>fweime+MH
yeah it’s mostly the runtime which is basically openjdk bits.