zlacker

>>ColinW+(OP)
"Furry.energy"? With a total of 49 members? My World of Warcraft guild has more active players...

>>Izmaki+Ka
This is exactly the point, isn't it? The smallest websites are destroyed, leaving only the megacorps.

>>Anthon+Kf
That is not the stated purpose of the law and there is recourse built into it. Too often folks view these laws as binaries where none exists.

>>twinkj+Kh
What recourse? A small, 5o-member community doesn't have the resources to ensure they're in compliance, and Ofcom's statement about how smaller players are "unlikely" to be affected is not particularly reassuring.

The "stated purpose" is irrelevant. Even if they are being honest about their stated purpose (questionable), the only thing that matters is how it ends up playing out in reality.