zlacker

>>tedsan+(OP)
This is a Military project. Have no doubts about it.

>>belter+X71
This is a money making scheme.

>>Gud+ie1
This has cosmological significance if it leads to superintelligence

>>arisAl+we1
It won't unless there's another (r)evolution in the underlying technology / science / algorithms, at this point scaling up just means they use bigger datasets or more iterations, but it's more finetuning and improving the existing output then coming up with a next generation / superintelligence.

>>Cthulh+al1
Okay, but let’s be pessimistic for a moment. What can we do if that revolution does happen, and they’re close to AGI?

I don’t believe the control problem is solved, but I’m not sure it would matter if it is.

>>Fillig+3o1
Being pessimistic, how come no human supergeniuses ever took over the world? Why didn't Leibniz make everyone else into his slaves?

I don't even understand what the proposed mechanism for "rouge AI enslaves humanity" is. It's scifi (and not hard scifi) as far as I can see.

>>ForHac+zo1
This is profoundly and disturbingly bad argument.

1)Leibniz wasn't superhuman 2) Leibniz couldn't work 24/7 3) he could not self increase the speed of his own hardware (body) 4) he could not spawn 1 trillion copies of him to work 24/7

Like how much time did you think before writing this