zlacker

[return to "United States Digital Service renamed to DOGE"]
1. w10-1+D2[view] [source] 2025-01-21 02:44:24
>>datadr+(OP)
The digital service did great work modernizing digital infrastructure of citizen-facing federal services.

AFAIK, it has *never* been stated publicly that DOGE or Mr. Musk would get control of this most essential service, responsible for sourcing identity verification, etc.

There's no relationship between bureaucracy efficiency efforts and the digital service. Indeed, one would have expected DOGE to be injected into the Office of Personnel Management.

It's disconcerting to see such a mismatch between rationale and deployment, particularly for a new agency with no oversight in Congress.

◧◩
2. hedora+e4[view] [source] 2025-01-21 02:55:48
>>w10-1+D2
I totally understand your point, but Musk said this was the end game when he bought twitter.

He wants x.com to be a single monolith “everything” app, just like they have in China.

The idea is to control currency, authentication, identity, reputation, commerce and communication, and to make use of it mandatory.

◧◩◪
3. aliasx+p5[view] [source] 2025-01-21 03:05:29
>>hedora+e4
Which quote was that? Not finding anything, but then again I'm not sure exactly how to phrase the search.
◧◩◪◨
4. inopin+v6[view] [source] 2025-01-21 03:14:46
>>aliasx+p5
multiple sources given at https://www.independent.co.uk/news/twitter-ap-elon-musk-meta...

also the whole "kitchen sink" image was probably a crude attempt at reinforcement

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. aliasx+Jc[view] [source] 2025-01-21 03:59:20
>>inopin+v6
> and to make use of it mandatory

That was really the part I was most curious about. As the article points out, a lot of big tech has been trying to make their app economy "indispensable" to consumers, but competition seems to have thwarted that mostly. If Elon is saying he'll make it mandatory by other means, then I'm really curious to hear what he is saying on the subject.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. philis+6f1[view] [source] 2025-01-21 14:30:43
>>aliasx+Jc
Thwarted??

Can you run a business if you're not on Google Maps?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. aliasx+ur1[view] [source] 2025-01-21 15:35:39
>>philis+6f1
I think you missed the context. Thwarted in the sense that none of them have the necessity and reach of WeChat.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. philis+Cf2[view] [source] 2025-01-21 19:37:21
>>aliasx+ur1
Then can you run a business without Visa?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. aliasx+yj2[view] [source] 2025-01-21 20:03:35
>>philis+Cf2
I feel like you're being a bit disingenuous. The article stated that market competition has mostly thwarted the attempts of any single big tech company reaching the levels that WeChat has in China. If you're proposing Visa has done that (across all categories, not just financial), I'd be curious to hear your proposal.

To answer your question, though, Visa doesn't process payments for the dozen or so cannabis shops in my town and they are all thriving. I'm not saying it's common, or easy, but the answer is yes.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦
10. philis+Wm2[view] [source] 2025-01-21 20:24:43
>>aliasx+yj2
Well you've disproven my point. Good work.
[go to top]