zlacker

[return to "Google's new pipe syntax in SQL"]
1. slayma+nS9[view] [source] 2024-08-28 22:30:50
>>heyden+(OP)
I actually work on SQL Server, but I also write a lot of KQL queries which also work this way and I totally agree that the sequential pipe stuff is easier to write. I haven't read through the whole paper, but one aspect that I really like is that I think it's easier to guide the query optimization in this sequential style.
◧◩
2. beart+p2a[view] [source] 2024-08-29 00:07:53
>>slayma+nS9
Is there any internal inertia for such changes to SQL server?
◧◩◪
3. WorldM+yqb[view] [source] 2024-08-29 14:22:26
>>beart+p2a
Given how Entity Framework is quite ubiquitous as "the ORM of choice" for SQL Server and its usage of C# Linq, there's certainly external momentum, whether or not SQL Server devs themselves are paying attention to how the majority of their users are writing queries today.
[go to top]