zlacker

[return to "Zuckerberg claims regret on caving to White House pressure on content"]
1. renega+l9[view] [source] 2024-08-27 11:37:30
>>southe+(OP)
- some people cannot think abstractly about speech, because it is skewed because of actions of Elon Musk, or Zuckerberg, or other individuals

- it is certain that governments want to control the narrative, and it is not always done in our interests

- sometime actions are done to help us, but [disinformation enters the room]

- Everything at CEO level is "political"

- centralization of social media and forums allowed for this behavior. It would be impossible to "control" the Internet with federated Internet

- various powers fight over the Internet (governments, China, Russia, corporations, billionaires etc.). This is why it difficult to tell what is the truth, everyone tries to shift our perception

- YouTube removed thumbs down not to protect small creators. Moderation on social media is also not to protect ordinary people, but to retain clean image, or to keep investors happy

- sometimes when social media removes post is censorship. Sometimes it is not, but both scenarios occur

- some people that complain about free speech might be influenced by foreign powers

- some people that say moderation is required want just more control over social media for their own benefit, agenda

- I do not know if there is a clean, ethical way to "run the social media"

◧◩
2. Secret+2P[view] [source] 2024-08-27 16:04:38
>>renega+l9
> I do not know if there is a clean, ethical way to "run the social media"

Darn, I guess we will have to shut down social media since it cannot be run ethically. A tough loss for the world..

[go to top]