zlacker

>>walter+(OP)
Please, help me understand something!

Private, remote communication was not a thing until a couple of decades ago: how can we consider it a basic human right?

>>pif+02a
That it didn't exist is not really that relvant. I.e. the US classified secrecy as a munition so under the US' framing it is a 2nd amendment right necessary to balance power between people and government.. Take it away from all and it is no longer essential.

>>dogsle+O9a
Has anyone used the 3rd amendment to argue against the government forcing them to include backdoors and surveillance mechanisms?