zlacker

[return to "EFF’s concerns about the UN Cybercrime Convention"]
1. walter+Wx[view] [source] 2024-08-10 15:13:51
>>walter+(OP)
UN cybercrime treaty was unanimously approved by 200 countries this week.
◧◩
2. acheon+AC[view] [source] 2024-08-10 16:01:14
>>walter+Wx
Well, that’s depressing. Were EFF recommendations applied?
◧◩◪
3. walter+jc1[view] [source] 2024-08-10 22:07:00
>>acheon+AC
EFF tweet, https://x.com/eff/status/1821672613468569628

  Member States traded away existing human rights safeguards to reach a contrived consensus for a treaty that will endanger journalists, dissenters, human rights activists, and every day people around the world.
Related thread: >>41210110
◧◩◪◨
4. bright+rO8[view] [source] 2024-08-14 02:02:27
>>walter+jc1
How does the Supreme Court handle interpreting of treaty agreements? It seems like the language of the 1st amendment would prevent the US from entering into an agreement that violated it?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Apollo+eR9[view] [source] 2024-08-14 13:34:19
>>bright+rO8
The US doesn't recognize any court as being above itself. Most countries probably don't either, they're supposed to go back home and get it passed in their own country's system.
[go to top]