zlacker

>>walter+(OP)
actual title "New U.N. Cybercrime Treaty Could Threaten Human Rights"

[In the coming weeks, the treaty will head to a vote among the General Assembly’s 193 member states. If it’s accepted by a majority there, the treaty will move to the ratification process, in which individual country governments must sign on.]

>>rolph+Cf
> in which individual country governments must sign on

meaning what? toothless is still toothless even using words like must. what happens if majority individuals do not? last I checked, the US still hasn't signed the same agreements about ICC or ICJ.

>>dylan6+Cs
I don't think it's the "must" used to express obligations or issue demands, but the "must" for stating necessary conditions.

"...in which countries must sign on [if they want the treaty to have legal standing within their jurisdiction]"