zlacker

[return to "OpenAI departures: Why can’t former employees talk?"]
1. a_wild+jt[view] [source] 2024-05-17 22:58:45
>>fnbr+(OP)
Is this a legally enforceable suppression of free speech? If so, are there ways to be open about OpenAI, without triggering punitive action?
◧◩
2. antifr+Jt[view] [source] 2024-05-17 23:03:35
>>a_wild+jt
OpenAI is not the government. Yet.
◧◩◪
3. imposs+aw[view] [source] 2024-05-17 23:27:26
>>antifr+Jt
Free speech is a much more general notion than anything having to do with governments.

The first amendment is a US free speech protection, but it's not prototypical.

You can also find this in some other free speech protections, for example that in the UDHR

>Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

doesn't refer to states at all.

◧◩◪◨
4. kfrzco+hx[view] [source] 2024-05-17 23:36:53
>>imposs+aw
Free speech is a God-given right. It is innate and given to you and everyone at birth, after which it can only be suppressed but never revoked.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. smabie+kB[view] [source] 2024-05-18 00:17:41
>>kfrzco+hx
Did God tell you this? People who talk about innate rights are just making things up
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. kfrzco+Qrc[view] [source] 2024-05-22 13:48:19
>>smabie+kB
You do not seem to be embracing an open-minded discussion about the philosophy. Why beg the question? Are you admitting the State is the authority under which you are granted all privilege to live, love, and work? Who is to stop someone if you are being attacked, and your children are at risk? Do you wish you had a permit to allow you to breath?

"self-evident," means it requires no formal proof, as it is obvious to all with common sense and reason.

[go to top]