zlacker

>>mjcl+(OP)
The more I find out about Altman the more I agree with the previous board about removing him. The guy just feels sleazy to me. Though he is doing what I want and that is not giving a fuck about artificial monopolies granted by government ie copyright

>>xbmcus+DG
The man is literally lobbying congress to obtain an artificial monopoly on AI in the name of "safety".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TO0J2Yw7usM

>>PostOn+sH
It would be helpful if you linked to something more specific (even a timestamp). I’m not going to watch this nearly 3-hour video to decide whether it supports your statement or not.

>>titano+NH
If you want to discover truths, 3 hours research seems like a good deal. Anyways, I got you covered. Altman has had a plan for this from the get go: https://www.techemails.com/p/sam-altman-emails-elon-musk

>>theyin+3e1
What's the quote from this that indicates he is trying to "obtain an artificial monopoly on AI"?

>>titano+kI2
"On Jun 24, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Sam Altman wrote:" [...] "5) I think the right plan with the regulation letter is to wait for this to get going and then I can just release it with a message like "now that we are doing this, l've been thinking a lot about what sort of constraints the world needs for safefy.""