zlacker

[return to "OpenAI departures: Why can’t former employees talk?"]
1. thorum+Bu[view] [source] 2024-05-17 23:10:57
>>fnbr+(OP)
Extra respect is due to Jan Leike, then:

https://x.com/janleike/status/1791498174659715494

◧◩
2. adamta+dH[view] [source] 2024-05-18 01:28:01
>>thorum+Bu
Reading that thread it’s really interesting to me. I see how far we’ve come in a short couple of years. But I still can’t grasp how we’ll achieve AGI within any reasonable amount of time. It just seems like we’re missing some really critical… something…

Idk. Folks much smarter than I seem worried so maybe I should be too but it just seems like such a long shot.

◧◩◪
3. candid+YO[view] [source] 2024-05-18 03:29:53
>>adamta+dH
Personally, I think catastrophic global warming and climate change will happen before we get AGI, possibly in part due to the pursuit of AGI. But as the saying goes, yes the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.
◧◩◪◨
4. concor+uW[view] [source] 2024-05-18 05:57:38
>>candid+YO
> catastrophic global warming and climate change will happen before we get AGI,

What are your timelines here? "Catastrophic" is vague but I'd put the climate change meaningfully affecting the quality of life of average westerner at end of century, while AGI could be before the middle of the century.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. awesom+yD1[view] [source] 2024-05-18 14:38:33
>>concor+uW
See this great video from Sabine Hossenfelder here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4S9sDyooxf4

We have surpassed the 1.5°C goal and are on track towards 3.5°C to 5°C. This accelerates the climate change timeline so that we'll see effects postulated for the end of the century in about ~20 years.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. loceng+482[view] [source] 2024-05-18 19:19:05
>>awesom+yD1
The climate models aren't based on accurate data, nor enough data, so they lack integrity and should be taken with a grain of salt.

Likewise, the cloud seeding they seem to be doing nearly worldwide now - the cloud formations from whatever they're spraying - are artificially changing weather patterns, and so a lot of the weather "anomalies" or unexpected-unusual weather-temperatures could very easily be because of those shenanigans; it could very easily be as a method to manufacture consent with the general population.

Similarly with the arson forest fires in Canada last summer, something like 90%+ of them were arson + a few years prior some of the governments in the prairie provinces (e.g. hottest and dryest) gutted their forest firefighting budgets; interesting behaviour considering if they're expecting more things to get hotter-dryer, you'd add to the budget, not take away from it, right?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. awesom+PN3[view] [source] 2024-05-19 15:57:44
>>loceng+482
> The climate models aren't based on accurate data

I'm sorry, do you have a source for that claim? You seem to dismiss the video without any evidence.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. loceng+wb4[view] [source] 2024-05-19 19:32:07
>>awesom+PN3
My other comment will link you to plenty of resources: >>40378842
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. awesom+5x4[view] [source] 2024-05-19 23:31:56
>>loceng+wb4
You linked to a comment about dieting. The comment contains no sources relevant to climate change.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦
10. loceng+fK4[view] [source] 2024-05-20 01:56:23
>>awesom+5x4
My bad! Sorry, not sure how that happened - here it is: >>40401703
[go to top]