zlacker

[return to "OpenAI departures: Why can’t former employees talk?"]
1. Button+7J[view] [source] 2024-05-18 01:52:45
>>fnbr+(OP)
So part of their compensation for working is equity, and when they leave thay have to sign an additional agreement in order to keep their previously earned compensation? How is this legal? Mine as well tell them they have to give all their money back too.

What's the consideration for this contract?

◧◩
2. throwa+ON[view] [source] 2024-05-18 03:08:52
>>Button+7J
That OpenAI are institutionally unethical. That such a young company can be become rotten so quickly can only be due to leadership instruction or leadership failure.
◧◩◪
3. smt88+2T[view] [source] 2024-05-18 04:56:44
>>throwa+ON
Look at Sam Altman's career and tweets. He's a clown at best, and at worst he's a manipulative crook who only cares about his own enrichment and uses pro-social ideas to give himself a veneer of trustworthiness.
◧◩◪◨
4. orland+xU[view] [source] 2024-05-18 05:27:14
>>smt88+2T
Awfully familiar to the other South-African emerald mine inheritor tech mogul.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. kmeist+V01[view] [source] 2024-05-18 07:07:52
>>orland+xU
I'm starting to think the relatives of South African emerald mine owners might not be the best people to trust...
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. pawelm+Vh1[view] [source] 2024-05-18 11:25:59
>>kmeist+V01
You are not responsible for the sins of your father regardless of how seriously fucked in the head he is.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. progra+lW1[view] [source] 2024-05-18 17:41:01
>>pawelm+Vh1
From a game theory perspective, it can make sense to punish future generations to prevent someone from YOLO'ing at the end of their life. But that only works if they actually care about their children, so perhaps it should be, "you are less responsible for the sins of your father the more seriously fucked in the head he is."
[go to top]