zlacker

[return to "OpenAI departures: Why can’t former employees talk?"]
1. Button+7J[view] [source] 2024-05-18 01:52:45
>>fnbr+(OP)
So part of their compensation for working is equity, and when they leave thay have to sign an additional agreement in order to keep their previously earned compensation? How is this legal? Mine as well tell them they have to give all their money back too.

What's the consideration for this contract?

◧◩
2. throwa+ON[view] [source] 2024-05-18 03:08:52
>>Button+7J
That OpenAI are institutionally unethical. That such a young company can be become rotten so quickly can only be due to leadership instruction or leadership failure.
◧◩◪
3. smt88+2T[view] [source] 2024-05-18 04:56:44
>>throwa+ON
Look at Sam Altman's career and tweets. He's a clown at best, and at worst he's a manipulative crook who only cares about his own enrichment and uses pro-social ideas to give himself a veneer of trustworthiness.
◧◩◪◨
4. orland+xU[view] [source] 2024-05-18 05:27:14
>>smt88+2T
Awfully familiar to the other South-African emerald mine inheritor tech mogul.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. kmeist+V01[view] [source] 2024-05-18 07:07:52
>>orland+xU
I'm starting to think the relatives of South African emerald mine owners might not be the best people to trust...
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. pawelm+Vh1[view] [source] 2024-05-18 11:25:59
>>kmeist+V01
You are not responsible for the sins of your father regardless of how seriously fucked in the head he is.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Loughl+ij1[view] [source] 2024-05-18 11:41:25
>>pawelm+Vh1
No but there is the old nature versus nurture debate. If you're raised in a home with a parent who has zero qualms about exploiting human suffering for profit, that's probably going to have an impact, right?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. johnis+Ey1[view] [source] 2024-05-18 13:55:33
>>Loughl+ij1
What are you implying here? The answer to the nature vs. nurture debate is "both", see "epigenetics" for more.

When considering the influence of a parent with morally reprehensible behavior, it's important to recognize that the environment a child grows up in can indeed have a profound impact on their development. Children raised in households where unethical behaviors are normalized may adopt some of these behaviors themselves, either through direct imitation or as a response to the emotional and psychological environment. However, it is equally possible for individuals to reject these influences.

Furthermore, while acknowledging the potential impact of a negative upbringing, it is critical to avoid deterministic assumptions about individuals. People are not simply products of their environment; they possess agency and the capacity for change, and we need to realize that not all individuals perceive and respond to environmental stimuli in the same way. Personal experiences, cognitive processes, and emotional responses can lead to different interpretations and reactions to similar environmental conditions. Therefore, while the influence of a parent's actions cannot be dismissed, it is neither fair nor accurate to presume that an individual will inevitably follow in their footsteps.

As for epigenetics: it highlights how environmental factors can influence gene expression, adding a layer of complexity to how we understand the interaction between genes and environment. While the environment can modify gene expression, individuals may exhibit different levels of susceptibility or resistance to these changes based on genetic variability.

[go to top]