zlacker

>>modele+(OP)
In what capacity is Musk suing OpenAI? Musk may have co-founded the company, but then he left (to avoid any potential future conflict of interest with his role as CEO of Tesla, as Tesla was increasingly becoming an AI-intensive company). Is he a shareholder, if not what gives him any say in the future of the company?

>>breadw+2J
The essential theory of the case is that OpenAI is misusing the funds Musk donated to it.

reads prayer for relief

> For a judicial determination that GPT-4 constitutes Artificial General Intelligence

Okay, WTF? I'm going to have to read the entire complaint now.....

>>jcranm+nT
AGI as defined narrowly by OpenAI, Microsoft et al for their contracts, not what scientists would define it as .

While I don’t think we are close to AGI, we also have to acknowledge that term is forever changing meaning and goal posts , even 10 years back a Turing test would be considered sufficient, obviously not anymore .

The scientific, public understanding is changing constantly and a court would have difficulty in making a decision if there is no consensus , it only has to see if the contractual definition has been met