zlacker

[return to "Amazon's Ring to stop letting police request doorbell video from users"]
1. indymi+79[view] [source] 2024-01-24 17:25:53
>>nickth+(OP)
I'm completely ok with the police asking me for video from my doorbell. I'm not ok with the police using the third party doctrine and asking the hosting service for my video without asking me. That video is every bit my property as the files in my desk drawer and should be subject to the same protections.
◧◩
2. smolde+Jg[view] [source] 2024-01-24 17:56:56
>>indymi+79
It's a mistake to trust a cloud service with your data and expect no one to take advantage of the fact that they are the ones holding it.
◧◩◪
3. goodSt+Yi[view] [source] 2024-01-24 18:05:27
>>smolde+Jg
If the so-called liberal Western regimes respected privacy rights they way they claim to it would be perfectly reasonable to trust a cloud provider with your data.
◧◩◪◨
4. indymi+6t[view] [source] 2024-01-24 18:52:29
>>goodSt+Yi
Technology moves faster than law, so we’re seeing areas where the existing precedent, such as the “Third Party Doctrine,” just doesn’t work well when I’m renting server space (all SaaS is this way) for much of what would have been personal property and papers. The nice thing about Western democracies is that they evolve over time and generally get better. In the US things are changing as judges are forced to review decisions and laws are changed as both judges and representatives start to understand new tech. It takes time.
[go to top]