zlacker

[return to "Brother have gotten to where they are now by not innovating"]
1. exabri+7R[view] [source] 2023-11-27 14:27:51
>>anothe+(OP)
Tangent, but related:

My dad is restoring a 1969 MG Midget. The right turn signal stopped working. Using nothing more than a voltmeter, I found a disconnected wire and a short to the frame.

I replaced the entire length of wire that was failing with $3 worth of wire, solder, and heat shrink tubing.

The lesson here is repairability and simplicity.

We’re constantly lectured to be “environmentally aware” by companies that no longer ensure their products will last a lifetime. There is 0 reason a modern phone couldn’t be used for the rest of your life. My Brother printer is nearing 12 years and is still on the same damn print cartridge. My Neato robotics vacuum has had countless parts replaced and is about the same age.

If you truly want to be a good steward of the earth, stop demanding/consuming latest and greatest, endless product and UI refreshes, and instead demand 30+ years out of a product (with small repairs).

◧◩
2. fooker+ZD2[view] [source] 2023-11-27 22:37:16
>>exabri+7R
>There is 0 reason a modern phone couldn’t be used for the rest of your life.

A phone, yes. A 'modern' phone conforming to our 'modern' expectations, no.

It would have to be significantly larger, less performant, and have a worse screen for it to last even ten years.

To make it repairable you'd have to make sure individual chips and capacitors are swappable, which costs ~2x power draw compared to a SOC.

◧◩◪
3. exabri+HK2[view] [source] 2023-11-27 23:10:15
>>fooker+ZD2
>less performant

Only because the code we write is crappier

[go to top]