zlacker

>>andsoi+(OP)
Not a word from Ilya. I can’t wrap my mind around his motivation. Did he really fire Sam over “AI safety” concerns? How is that remotely rational.

>>valine+v3
> Did he really fire Sam over "AI safety" concerns? How is that remotely rational.

Not rational iff (and unlike Sustkever, Hinton, Bengio) you are not a "doomer" / "decel". Ilya's very vocal and on record that he suspects there may be "something else" going on with these models. He and DeepMind claim AlphaGo is already AGI (correction: ASI) in a very narrow domain (https://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/2311.02462/). Ilya particularly predicts it is a given that Neural Networks would achieve broad AGI (superintelligence) before alignment is figured out, unless researchers start putting more resources in it.

(like LeCun, I am not a doomer; but I am also not Hinton to know any better)

>>ignora+27
> "[Artificial General Intelligence] in a very narrow domain."

Which is it?

>>mcpack+B8
Read the paper linked above, and if you don't agree that's okay. There are many who don't.

>>ignora+Ua
Has anyone written a response to this paper? Their main gist is to try to define AGI empirically using only what is measurable.