zlacker

>>himara+(OP)
The key question in my mind is not who is going to be on the new board, but whether Ilya Sutskever will stay if Altman comes back. I worry that OpenAI without Ilya is not going to produce groundbreaking innovations at the same pace. Hopefully Sam Altman and Ilya Sutskever can patch things up. That's more important than who they add or remove to the board.

>>breadw+D9
A rough guess is that Elon will pick up Ilya, with a promise to really aim for safe AGI.

>>trasht+Lg
If Ilya’s problem with Sam was that he was acting out on his own and deviating from founding principles, he’s not going to have a good time under Elon.

>>apppli+ah
Elon Musk has been very critical of OpenAI's switch from a non-profit focused on AI safety to a for-profit competing with Tesla.

It's why he fell out and left OpenAI despite investing $100 million to start it.

I'd say he's well aligned with Ilya's position. Early on I wondered if he was an instigator of the entire board coup.

>>somepe+uq
He left because they didn't allow him to be in charge.

>>Rivier+Ts
Musk left in 2018 after disagreements over the future of the company. In 2019 OpenAI started their 'OpenAI LP' for-profit entity. It seems entirely reasonable that the profit vs mission motive that seems to be driving this issue, is also what drove Musk to leave.

>>somena+ec1
Come on now, does it sound like Musk to you to leave due to the prospect of profit? Surely there was some kind of power struggle there that he couldn't win, and the mission thing was a good story to tell others.